Active methodologies in mathematics teaching in the final years of elementary education

contributions to meaningful learning in public schools

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57108/iesj.2026.6-2.20

Keywords:

active methodologies, mathematics teaching, meaningful learning, elementary education, public school

Abstract

Mathematics teaching in the final years of Elementary Education involves challenges related to heterogeneous classrooms, gaps in prior knowledge, the increasing abstraction of mathematical content, and the need to make learning meaningful. In this context, active methodologies have been discussed as ways of reorganizing pedagogical work by increasing student participation without diminishing teachers' responsibility for selecting, mediating, and systematizing knowledge. This article analyzes the contributions of active methodologies to meaningful Mathematics learning in the final years of Elementary Education, with emphasis on the concrete conditions of public schools. It is a narrative literature review with a qualitative and analytical approach, grounded in classical authors on meaningful learning and critical education, Brazilian curriculum documents, and recent studies on active methodologies and Mathematics Education. The analysis was organized into four axes: meaningful learning and prior knowledge; student agency and teacher mediation; active strategies applicable to Mathematics; and limits and conditions for implementation in public schools. The studies examined indicate potential for greater engagement, argumentation, problem solving, collaboration, and connections between mathematical concepts and contextualized situations. However, the evidence also suggests that activity, technology, or playfulness alone does not ensure learning. Active methodologies can foster more meaningful mathematical learning when they are connected to clear objectives, formative assessment, prior knowledge, conceptual formalization, and the actual working conditions of teachers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ednan Miranda Santos, Ivy Enber Christian University

    Master's student in the Graduate Program in Educational Sciences at Ivy Enber Christian University.

References

AUSUBEL, D. P. Aquisição e retenção de conhecimentos: uma perspectiva cognitiva. Lisboa: Plátano Edições Técnicas, 2003.

BACICH, L.; MORAN, J. (org.). Metodologias ativas para uma educação inovadora: uma abordagem teórico-prática. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2018.

BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Base Nacional Comum Curricular. Brasília, DF: MEC, 2018. Disponível em: https://basenacionalcomum.mec.gov.br/.

CEVIKBAS, M.; KAISER, G. Can flipped classroom pedagogy offer promising perspectives for mathematics education on pandemic-related issues? A systematic literature review. ZDM – Mathematics Education, [s. l.], v. 55, p. 177-191, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01388-w.

DAMIAN, P. V. da S.; KAIBER, C. T. Metodologias ativas como estratégia para a aprendizagem significativa em Matemática. TANGRAM – Revista de Educação Matemática, Dourados, v. 6, n. 4, p. 161-182, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.30612/tangram.v6i4.17672.

DANTAS, J. M.; SOUZA, R. A. Trabalhando com porcentagem a partir de uma sequência didática estruturada na perspectiva das metodologias ativas. Revista Paranaense de Educação Matemática, Campo Mourão, v. 10, n. 22, p. 531-550, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.33871/22385800.2021.10.22.531-550.

DANTE, L. R. Formulação e resolução de problemas de matemática: teoria e prática. São Paulo: Ática, 2009.

FREIRE, P. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996.

INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTUDOS E PESQUISAS EDUCACIONAIS ANÍSIO TEIXEIRA. Relatório Saeb 2023: dados de proficiência. Brasília, DF: Inep, 2026. v. 1. Disponível em: https://download.inep.gov.br/saeb/resultados/relatorio-saeb_volume_1_2023.pdf.

MIRANDA, S. S.; ALMEIDA, W. A. de. Metodologias ativas no contexto amazônico: um olhar sobre o ensino da Matemática no Ensino Fundamental. Revista de Estudos Aplicados em Educação, São Caetano do Sul, v. 10, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.13037/rea-e.vol10.9907.

MOREIRA, M. A. Aprendizagem significativa: a teoria e textos complementares. São Paulo: Livraria da Física, 2011.

SANTOS, L. S.; CRUZ, K. C.; GONZALES, F. L. P.; PEREIRA, E. C.; MACHADO, C. C. Metodologias ativas no processo de ensino e aprendizagem de Matemática nos anos finais do Ensino Fundamental: mapeamento de produções científicas. Revista de Educação Matemática, São Paulo, v. 19, n. 1, e022026, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.37001/remat25269062v19id710.

YE, H.; LIANG, B.; NG, O.-L.; CHAI, C. S. Integration of computational thinking in K–12 mathematics education: a systematic review on CT-based mathematics instruction and student learning. International Journal of STEM Education, [s. l.], v. 10, art. 3, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00396-w.

Published

2026-10-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Active methodologies in mathematics teaching in the final years of elementary education: contributions to meaningful learning in public schools. (2026). IVY ENBER SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL, 6(2), 418-443. https://doi.org/10.57108/iesj.2026.6-2.20

Similar Articles

1-10 of 120

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.